Equanimity is never recommended as a good thing on its own. It’s always recommended in conjunction with right effort and other skillful qualities.

“Equanimity is never recommended as a good thing on its own. This is perhaps the most important point of tonight’s talk, so I’ll repeat it: Equanimity is never recommended as a good thing on its own. It’s always recommended in conjunction with right effort and other skillful qualities. In terms of equanimity on the path, this fits in with the Buddha’s observation — which we discussed under the topic of persistence — that the causes of suffering fall into two types: those that go away simply when you look at them with equanimity, and those that go away only when you exert any of the three types of fabrication against them. For instance, there are cases where lust goes away when you simply watch it steadily. It’s as if it’s embarrassed to show its face. There are other times, though, when you stare at your lust and it stares right back, not the least bit embarrassed. That’s when you need to make a concerted effort to get rid of it. You have to use your discernment skillfully to determine which kind of case you’re facing, and you need to have more than just equanimity in your box of tools.”

~ Thanissaro Bhikkhu “Equanimity”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Buddha talks about dispassion, disenchantment, equanimity — and to us it sounds cold. But everything in the Buddha’s teachings is put in the service of freedom.

What would actually happen if I made the effort to change the sad way things are? What would be the unintended consequences?

Keep working away and away and away at this habit of being truthful, not letting the setbacks of aging, illness and death knock you off course. You just keep coming back, coming back.